At the beginning of 2020, the Central Bank of Sweden began testing its own digital currency, called e-krona, due to the fact that the population stopped using cash in recent years and with the aim of making cross-border payments with faster.
After a year of testing, the agency presented a report in which they indicate, among other things, that they will need to adapt current legislation, due to the novelty of central bank digital currencies (also known as CBDC, for its acronym in English).
‘Central bank digital currencies are new and have become relevant in recent years, both in Sweden and abroad. Therefore, there is no legislation or any consultative example in this field. The issuance of an e-krona would probably require new legislation, regardless of the model, design and technical solution used,”the document highlights.
The financial institution adds that one of the unknowns of the project is related to the storage of the coins and whether the e-krona should work offline (without internet access), an option that was not tested in the first stage of the essays.
The text presented by the Central Bank states that the test was carried out within the same bank, but they hope to shape it in the coming years. In fact, they assure that, in the future, they will allow the participation of commercial banks as part of the next phase of the project that could last until 2026.
Regarding the technology used in the project, they consider that the network where the e-krone circulate, based on the Corda blockchain platform of the company R3, offers possibilities, but it is also new and requires more research .
“The technology provides the ability to create uniquely identifiable e-krona, but it has not been tested when it comes to processing retail payments on the scale and with the level of security required by a central bank’s digital currency,” they say in a press release .
The Swedish digital currency project, carried out by the Central Bank of Sweden, in conjunction with Accenture, left a trail of comments after the publication of the report on the first trial of the e-krona.
In this sense, the user at Datavetaren, who introduces himself as a software and computer engineer, wrote on the social network Twitter that “R3 Corda (based on UTXO) has been used”, something that he considers “useless and a waste of money from users. Taxes”. In addition, he asserted that the private sector “quickly came to the conclusion that R3’s Corda sucks.”
But the comments did not stop there. Miguel Lopez, co-founder of Flossy stems, a company focused on virtualized infrastructures, also joined the criticism of the Corda blockchain: “European governments are willing to spend indecent amounts of public money on useless or obsolete technologies, giving money to companies that are experts in blockchain smoke (DLT) that have already been discarded by the market.